shopmigrationexperts+

Service shape

Full-service Shopify Plus replatforming

Single-agency replatforming covering data migration, theme rebuild, app re-implementation, SEO audit, and stabilisation.

Get matched with a migration specialist

Share a few details. We'll route your request to a vetted specialist within one business day.

Problem

Brand

Contact

Cost

$60K-$220K for $5M-$50M brands. Larger engagements ($50M+) scale into $220K-$700K+. See the cost guide for detailed breakdown.

Timeline

14-26 weeks elapsed end-to-end: 2-4 weeks discovery, 8-16 weeks build, 4-8 weeks stabilisation.

Full-service replatforming is the default engagement shape for $5M-$50M DTC brands moving onto Shopify Plus. One agency owns the entire migration — discovery, data, theme, apps, SEO, launch, stabilisation — from kickoff through the eight-week post-launch window.

The advantage of full-service over split engagements is coordination. One agency, one PM, one runbook, one accountability surface. The disadvantage is cost: full-service agencies carry coordination overhead that split engagements skip. The trade is real and depends on internal team capacity to coordinate split work themselves.

This page describes what a typical full-service engagement actually covers, what it does not, and what brand profiles it fits well. Use it to scope agency conversations and to recognise when a full-service shape is the right call versus when a split or boutique engagement fits better.

What it includes

In scope

Structured discovery (2-4 weeks)

Redirect map build, data dictionary, app re-implementation plan, go-live runbook. The discovery deliverables become the engagement contract; change orders work against the same baseline.

Data migration workstream

Catalog, customer, recent order history via automated migration platform (Cart2Cart, LitExtension) plus Matrixify reconciliation. Metafield mapping, B2B data, subscription state migration.

Theme rebuild

Premium template selection, customisation, design system handoff. Page builder configuration (Shogun, PageFly) for marketing pages. Theme performance optimisation pre-launch.

App re-implementation

Shopify-side equivalents for source-platform apps: subscriptions (Recharge/Skio), loyalty, reviews, search/filtering, customer accounts. Configuration and integration testing.

SEO migration audit

Indexed-URL audit, redirect map validation against staging, sitemap submission, post-launch ranking monitoring. The discipline that determines whether SEO survives.

Launch and stabilisation

Cutover runbook execution, day-zero monitoring, the first eight weeks of post-launch incident response and redirect-map gap closure.

What it does not include

Out of scope

ERP / OMS integration beyond standard

Standard Shopify integrations (Shopify Plus B2B, multi-location inventory) are in scope. Custom ERP, NetSuite, or proprietary OMS integration is its own workstream and typically requires iPaaS.

Ongoing post-launch optimisation

The engagement ends at the eight-week stabilisation mark. Ongoing CRO, theme evolution, and growth services are separate engagements with different agencies or service tiers.

Brand or design strategy work

The engagement uses existing brand and design assets. Brand-refresh work concurrent with replatforming requires a separate strategy engagement before or alongside the migration.

Custom Shopify app development

Standard apps from the Shopify App Store are in scope. Custom Shopify apps requiring development (private apps, embedded apps, public app submission) are separate engagements.

Brand fit

Who this engagement fits

Fits well

Brands without dedicated migration capability internally

Single-agency ownership reduces coordination burden on the internal team. Brands with limited product or design capacity benefit most from full-service.

$5M-$50M DTC brands with standard complexity

Standard catalog, customer, and order migration patterns. The engagement model is calibrated for this brand size; outliers above or below need different shapes.

Brands wanting accountability concentrated in one place

When something breaks mid-engagement, the single agency owns the resolution. Brands that have had bad experiences with split engagements often prefer full-service for this reason alone.

Does not fit

Brands with strong in-house product and design teams

Full-service engagements duplicate internal capacity. Split engagements (data migration partner + in-house theme team) often produce better outcomes at lower cost for brands with the internal capacity to coordinate.

Enterprise brands ($50M+) with complex integration footprints

Full-service mid-market agencies often lack the depth for enterprise integration work. Boutique data + enterprise SI partner is usually the better shape.

Brands needing concurrent brand refresh

Full-service migration agencies are not brand strategy partners. Brands wanting to combine replatforming with rebranding need to engage a brand-strategy partner first, then a migration partner against that strategy.

Frequently asked

Questions about this engagement shape

What is the difference between full-service and split engagements?

Full-service is one agency for everything. Split is multiple partners (data migration agency, theme partner, SEO specialist) coordinated by the brand. Full-service trades higher cost for lower coordination burden. Split trades coordination burden for typically lower total cost. The right shape depends on internal capacity to coordinate.

Can we split a full-service engagement mid-way through?

Technically yes, operationally painful. Mid-engagement scope changes that move work to a different partner produce coordination overhead that outweighs the cost savings. If split engagement is the right shape, decide that during discovery, not during build.

Do full-service agencies include post-launch optimisation?

Most include the eight-week stabilisation phase (incident response, redirect-map gap closure, monitoring). Ongoing optimisation (CRO, theme evolution, growth services) is typically a separate engagement, often with the same agency under a different contract.

How do we evaluate full-service agencies?

Reference checks at brand size with specific shape: recent migration that went smoothly and one that did not, both at the brand's revenue tier. The patterns the agency names in the difficult reference reveal how they will handle the engagement. Pick by reference quality, not capability deck.